BALJIT SINGH,VPO TIBBA DISTT. SANGRUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, MLK, MALERKOTLA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
PHYSICAL HEARING
HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1212/CHANDI/2025
(िनधाŊरण वषŊ / Assessment Year: 2018-19)
Shri Baljit Singh
S/O Amarjit Singh, Village Tibba
Sangrur, Punjab – 148024
बनाम/ Vs.
ITO Ward-1, Malerkotla
Sangrur
Punjab- 148024
̾थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. CWQPS-3205-K
(अपीलाथŎ/Appellant)
:
(ŮȑथŎ / Respondent)
अपीलाथŎकीओरसे/ Appellant by :
None
ŮȑथŎकीओरसे/Respondent by :
Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
01-12-2025
घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
01-12-2025
आदेश / O R D E R
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2018- 19 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC [CIT(A)] dated 22-07-2025 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 30-08-2021. At the time of hearing, none appeared for the assessee. The Ld. Sr. DR pleaded for dismissal of the appeal. 2. In the assessment order, Ld. AO made addition of Rs.14.02 Lacs for certain compensation. Upon perusal of para 8.2 of impugned first appeal order, it could be seen that the assessee failed to make any effective representation therein and accordingly, the assessment was confirmed. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before Tribunal. 3. Keeping in mind the principles of natural justice, I deem it fit to grant another opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly, the appeal is restored back to Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on merits with a direction to the assessee to plead and prove its case forthwith. 4. The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 01st December, 2025. - (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 01-12-2025
आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant
2. ŮȑथŎ/Respondent
3. आयकरआयुƅ/CIT
4. िवभागीयŮितिनिध/DR
5. गाडŊफाईल/GF