SHRI DEEPAK RAGHANI,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-8(3), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The assessee then prayed to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C”
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar
order
: February 03, 2022 Hearing through Video Conferencing ORDER
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 21.02.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Kolkata [hereinafter as ‘CIT(A)’].
The ld. Counsel for the assessee stated at the Bar that the assessee has availed Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. He, therefore, prays that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn. Under the circumstances, we allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Ordered accordingly.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order is pronounced in the open court on 03.02.2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026