SOCIETY OF ST MARY THE VIRGIN-ENGLISH CONGREGATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (E), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6988/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 April 2021AY 2019-203 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT (Exemption) had not properly considered the assessee's replies and had overlooked some submissions. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT (Exemption) for reconsideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application for non-production of certain documents and for not proving the genuineness of the objects.

What were the issues?

Whether the registration under Section 12AA was rightly rejected by the CIT (Exemption) due to non-production of documents and lack of opportunity for hearing.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA,Section 2(15)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Appellant: Shri Raja B.Singh-Ld. AR)
For Respondent: Shri Neehar Pandey-Ld. CIT-DR

Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

In this appeal, the assessee is aggrieved by rejection of registration application u/s 12AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 vide CIT (Exemption) order dated 09/09/2019. 2. The Ld. AR submitted that application has been rejected for non- production of certain documents which were never called for by Ld. CIT(E). The Ld. AR submitted that the application has been rejected without proving any opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Our attention

has been drawn to the fact that the registration has been granted from next year whereas the assessee seek registration from this year itself. The Ld. CIT-DR submitted the requisite details could not be filed by the assessee.

3.

Upon careful consideration of impugned order, we find that the assessee applied for registration u/s 12AA before Ld. CIT (E) by filing Form No.10A on 28/03/2019. Though certain details as called for by Ld. CIT (E) were filed by the assessee, however, as narrated in para-4 of the impugned order, the assessee could not file certain details / documents. Consequently, an opinion was formed that it was not possible to ascertain the nature of objects for which trust was created and that the objects were genuine and charitable in terms of Sec. 2(15). Accordingly, the registration was denied. The Ld. AR has placed before us notice issued by Ld. CIT (E) and assessee’s submissions from time to time. Upon perusal of the same, we find that the replies have not been properly considered by Ld. CIT (E) and some of the submissions have been overlooked. As agreed to by both the representatives, we are inclined to restore the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT (E) for reconsideration of assessee’s submissions that the registration should have been granted as per assessee’s application dated 28/03/2019. The assessee, in turn, is directed to file the requisite details.

4.

The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 15th April, 2021. (Mahavir Singh) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) उपाध्यक्ष / Vice President लेखा दस्य / Accountant Member मुिंबई Mumbai; सदनािंक Dated : 15/04/2021 Sr.PS, Jaisy Varghese

आदेशकीप्रधिधलधपअग्रेधर्ि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथी/ The Appellant 2. प्रत्यथी/ The Respondent आयकरआयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 3. 4. आयकरआयुक्त/ CIT– concerned 5. सवभागीयप्रसतसनसध, आयकरअपीलीयअसधकरण, मुिंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गार्डफाईल / Guard File

आदेशाि सार/ BY ORDER,

उप/सहायक पुंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →