SOCIETY OF ST MARY THE VIRGIN-ENGLISH CONGREGATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (E), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT (Exemption) had not properly considered the assessee's replies and had overlooked some submissions. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT (Exemption) for reconsideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application for non-production of certain documents and for not proving the genuineness of the objects.
What were the issues?
Whether the registration under Section 12AA was rightly rejected by the CIT (Exemption) due to non-production of documents and lack of opportunity for hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
In this appeal, the assessee is aggrieved by rejection of registration application u/s 12AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 vide CIT (Exemption) order dated 09/09/2019. 2. The Ld. AR submitted that application has been rejected for non- production of certain documents which were never called for by Ld. CIT(E). The Ld. AR submitted that the application has been rejected without proving any opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Our attention
has been drawn to the fact that the registration has been granted from next year whereas the assessee seek registration from this year itself. The Ld. CIT-DR submitted the requisite details could not be filed by the assessee.
Upon careful consideration of impugned order, we find that the assessee applied for registration u/s 12AA before Ld. CIT (E) by filing Form No.10A on 28/03/2019. Though certain details as called for by Ld. CIT (E) were filed by the assessee, however, as narrated in para-4 of the impugned order, the assessee could not file certain details / documents. Consequently, an opinion was formed that it was not possible to ascertain the nature of objects for which trust was created and that the objects were genuine and charitable in terms of Sec. 2(15). Accordingly, the registration was denied. The Ld. AR has placed before us notice issued by Ld. CIT (E) and assessee’s submissions from time to time. Upon perusal of the same, we find that the replies have not been properly considered by Ld. CIT (E) and some of the submissions have been overlooked. As agreed to by both the representatives, we are inclined to restore the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT (E) for reconsideration of assessee’s submissions that the registration should have been granted as per assessee’s application dated 28/03/2019. The assessee, in turn, is directed to file the requisite details.
The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 15th April, 2021. (Mahavir Singh) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) उपाध्यक्ष / Vice President लेखा दस्य / Accountant Member मुिंबई Mumbai; सदनािंक Dated : 15/04/2021 Sr.PS, Jaisy Varghese
आदेशकीप्रधिधलधपअग्रेधर्ि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथी/ The Appellant 2. प्रत्यथी/ The Respondent आयकरआयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 3. 4. आयकरआयुक्त/ CIT– concerned 5. सवभागीयप्रसतसनसध, आयकरअपीलीयअसधकरण, मुिंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गार्डफाईल / Guard File
आदेशाि सार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पुंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026