Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, HONBLE & SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HONBLEDr. Raju L Bhatia v. Shri Vipul Mody Shri Bharat Andhale
Date of Hearing : 20.04.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 20.04.2021 O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD (JM)
This appeal is filed by the assessee against order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, Mumbai [hereinafter in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 05.07.2019 for the A.Y. 2012-13.
At the time of hearing the appeal virtually, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed declaration and undertaking in Form-1 to settle the litigation and Form 3 is received from the Revenue accepting the said declaration. Ld. Counsel for the assessee requested for withdrawal of appeal.
(A.Y: 2012-13) Dr. Raju L Bhatia 3. In view of the submission of the Ld. Counsel that assessee has already filed application under Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme and received Form-3 from the Revenue accepting the said declaration, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file miscellaneous application in case the application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is rejected by the revenue.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the virtual court on 20.04.2021.