BIGDEAL INFRACON PVT.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 5 (4), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal based on their application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the issuance of Form-3 by the Revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Tax Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the order dated 20th September 2019, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)–53, Mumbai, pertaining to the assessment year 2014–15.
When the case was called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee to represent its case. However, we have heard the learned Departmental Representative.
2 Bigdeal Infracon Pvt. Ltd.
As we can see from the record available before us, the assessee has filed a letter dated 29th April 2021, seeking withdrawal of its appeal in view of the fact that it has applied for settling the tax dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Tax Scheme, 2020. The letter submitted by the assessee is accompanied by the Certificate in Form–3 issued by the Revenue. The aforesaid letter submitted by the assessee is kept on record.
The learned Departmental Representative has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee.
Considering the fact that the assessee has sought withdrawal of the present appeal, as the assessee has applied for settling the dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, we permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal at this stage since the Department issued Form no.3. With these observations, the appeal by the assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026