Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI M.BALAGANESH
आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH:
These appeals in 818/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2011-12 to 2017-18 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-60, Mumbai in appeal Nos. CIT(A)-60/IT-101223/JCIT(TDS)OSD-2(3)/2017-18, CIT(A)-60/IT- 01224/JCIT(TDS)OSD-2(3)/2017-18 CIT(A)-60/IT-101225/JCIT(TDS)OSD- 2(3)/2017-18, CIT(A)-60/IT-101226/JCIT(TDS)OSD-2(3)/2017-18 CIT(A)- 60/IT-101227/JCIT(TDS)OSD-2(3)/2017-18 & CIT(A)-60/IT- 101228/JCIT(TDS)OSD-2(3)/2017-18 dated 28/11/2018 & 28/12/2018
The Board of Control for Cricket in India respectively (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act).
We find that the assessee filed a letter dated 01/05/2021 mentioning that an application had been preferred under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle these tax disputes for the years under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat these appeals pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced in open Court on 03/05/2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (SAKTIJIT DEY) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 03/05/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
The Board of Control for Cricket in India