PETLA JAGANNADH,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-14(1), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue did not contest the assessee's submission.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for Assessment Year 2007-08. The Assessing Officer had granted the necessary relief in consequential proceedings. The assessee no longer wished to press the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn as relief was already granted in consequential proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu
Assessment Year: 2007-08 Shri Petla Jagannadh, Vs. The Asst.Commissioner of Hyderabad. Income Tax, Circle – 14(1), PAN : AEKPP2273E. Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri A. Srinivas. Revenue by: Shri Rohit Majumdar Date of hearing: 03.01.2022 Date of pronouncement: 05.01.2022 O R D E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2007-08 arises from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 6, Hyderabad’s order dated 17.01.2018 in involving proceedings u/s. 143 r.w.s. 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]. Heard both parties. Case file perused.
Learned authorized representative submits at the outset that the assessee no more wishes to press for the instant appeal as the Assessing Officer has already granted him the necessary relief in consequential proceedings. The Revenue is fair enough in not contesting the assessee’s averments. We thus accept the assessee’s prayer to withdraw the instant appeal.
This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 5th January, 2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026