AFZAL MAQBOOL HUSAIN MALIK,MUMBAI vs. ITO 26 (1)(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay and directed the assessee to e-file the appeal within 30 days. The first appellate authority was instructed to admit and adjudicate the appeal on its merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a manual appeal instead of the mandated electronic form. The first appellate authority dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to this technical lapse, despite the appeal being filed within the time limit.
What were the issues?
Whether a manual appeal, filed within the time limit but not in the prescribed electronic format, can be dismissed as not maintainable. Whether technical lapses should deprive an assessee of justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ ए ” �ायपीठ मुंबई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय �ी छ�ला नागे�� �साद, �ाियक सद� एवं माननीय �ी मनोज कुमार अ�वाल ,लेखा सद� के सम�। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकर अपील सं./ (िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Afzal Maqbool Husain Malik ITO-26(1)(1) 361, 4th Lane, Gulab Shah Estate बनाम/ G-Block, Kautilya Bhawan Behind Kural Bus Depot, LBS Road BKC, Bandra (E) Vs. Kurla (W), Mumbai – 400070 Mumbai - 400051 PAN No. : AHEPM-7863-J (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��थ� / Respondent) : Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Brajendra Kumar – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 03/05/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 03/05/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
At the time of hearing of appeal, none appeared for assessee. However, Ld. DR submitted that the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable by first appellate authority since it was not filed electronically as prescribed under the rules. The manual appeal filed by the assessee has been dismissed as inadmissible by invoking the provisions of Section 249(1).
The registry has also noted a delay of 19 days in filing of the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by the assessee on the strength of condonation petition dated 14/10/2019 which is supported by the affidavit of the assessee. After going through the contents of the same and considering the period of delay, we are inclined to condone the delay and proceed with the disposal of appeal.
The material facts are that in an assessment u/s 143(3) on 18/03/2016, the assessee was saddled with certain addition u/s 68 for Rs.53.45 Lacs. The assessee filed manual appeal on 20/04/2016 before learned first appellate authority which was within time. However, as per extant rules, the assessee was required to file the appeal in electronic form latest by 15/06/2016. The assessee failed to attend appellate proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable. Aggrieved, the assessee is under further appeal before us. 4. Upon careful consideration, we find that the appeal has been dismissed only in view of the fact that it was filed in manual form instead of electronic form as mandated by extant rules. However, the undisputed facts that emerge is that the manual appeal was filed within time prescribed for filing the appeal. The said appeal in terms of CBDT Notification No. SO 637(E) [No. 11/2016 (F. No. 149/150/2015-TPL)], dated 1-3-2016, was required to file digitally in electronic form. The failure to file the same in the prescribed form has resulted into dismissal of appeal in limine. Keeping in view the principles of natural justice, we are of the considered opinion that mere technical lapses could not deprive the assessee to seek justice in deserving cases. Therefore, in terms of the judgment of this Tribunal rendered in All India Federation of Tax Petitioners Vs. ITO [ITA No. 7134/Mum/2017 dated 04/05/2018], the assessee is directed to e-file the appeal in the prescribed manner before Ld. first appellate authority within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. Thereafter, the Ld. first appellate authority is directed to admit the appeal and adjudicate the same on merits without seeking condonation of delay. 5. The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 03rd May, 2021.
More judgments on Section 249(1)
- Abhishek Gupta, Delhi vs Circle Int. Tax 1(3)(1), DelhiITITA 248/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Abhishek Gupta, Delhi vs Circle Int. Tax 1(3)(1), DelhiITITA 247/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Shree Ashapuri Shree Mahodari Mataji Trust… vs Income Tax Officer, JaloreITA 505/JODH/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Apr 2026AY 2017-18
- Mfar Constructions Private Limited… vs DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), BangaloreITA 938/BANG/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed6 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
- Nishtha Vincom Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 6(3), KolkataITA 1160/KOL/2025[2012-2013]Status: Disposed28 Oct 2025AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026