Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “H”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY, JM These appeals by the assessee arise out of three separate orders, all dated 28.05.2019, of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 51, Mumbai confirming the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-2016.
When the appeals were called for hearing no one was present for the assessee. However, Ms. Apeksha Gada, learned Authorized Representative of the assessee has sent an e-mail stating that on instructions of the assessee, she would like to withdraw these appeals as the assessee has opted for settling 2 MUM/2019 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 the dispute arising in these appeals under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and has also received certificates issued by the designated authority in Form 3.
The learned Departmental Representative has no objection to the aforesaid request of the assessee.
In view of the facts discussed above and considering assessee’s request, we permit him to withdraw these appeals. Accordingly, appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.