Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESH & SHRI RAVISH SOODSmt. Renudevi D. Modi
ORDER PER RAVISH SOOD, J.M: The captioned appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-29, Mumbai, dated 25.07.2019, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 30.12.2017 for A.Y. 2015-16.
The assessee has filed a letter dated 14th April, 2021, wherein it is inter alia stated by her that she has filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 with respect to the captioned appeal for A.Y. 2015-16 which is pending before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Copy of the Form 1 and Form 2 filed by the assessee under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 has been filed alongwith the present application.
The ld. D.R did not controvert the aforesaid factual position as had been canvassed before us.
In view of the above, we dismiss the revenue’s appeal as withdrawn, subject to a rider that in the unlikely event the matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme then the appellant revenue shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of its aforesaid appeal.
2 ITO-18(3)(2) Vs. Smt. Renudevi D. Modi