G. SUDHAKAR,ARAKKONAM vs CIT(A), CHENNAI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Appellant: Shri. N. Arjunraj (CA) – Ld. AR, Shri P. Sajit Kumar (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR

For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR

आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench 1. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has already opted for settlement of dispute for the year under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme), 2020 and therefore, the assessee seeks withdrawal of these appeals. The same was not objected to by Ld. DR.

& 283/Chny/2017 - 2 -

In view of foregoing, both the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to assessee to seek restoration of the appeals, in case the declaration filed under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons.

Both the appeals stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on 25th January, 2022.

G. SUDHAKAR,ARAKKONAM vs. CIT(A), CHENNAI