SONAL KAMAL GUPTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC - 5(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and requested withdrawal. The Revenue did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee later submitted a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn based on the assessee's declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
ORDER PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant assessment year is 2015-16. The appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-53, Mumbai [in short ‘CIT(A)’] and arises out of the assessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act 1961, (the ‘Act’).
At the outset, when the appeal was called out for hearing, none has appeared on behalf of the assessee in spite of calls. Vide letter dated 04.05.2021, assessee submitted that it has filed the necessary declaration under Direct Tax
Sonal Kamal Gupta 2 Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) and confirmed the receipt of Form-3 and prayer to withdraw the appeal.
The Ld. DR also did not object to course so suggested.
In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn based on the letter submitted before us and assessee has filed the relevant Form No. 3 under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, 2020.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 02/06/2021.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026