M/S NAHAR GEMS,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 19(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had initiated the Vivadh se Vishwas settlement process. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek restoration if the settlement is not finalized.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted to settle disputes under the Direct Tax Vivadh se Vishwas Act, 2020. They received Form 3, paid taxes, and submitted Form 4, but had not yet received Form 5.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivadh se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivadh se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Date of hearing 10-06-2021 Date of pronouncement 10-06-2021 O R D E R Captioned appeals by the same assessee arise out four separate orders, all dated 18-03-2019, of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Mumbai for the assessment years 2007-08, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2013-14.
At the outset, learned authorized representative of the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted for settling the dispute arising in these appeals under the Direct Tax Vivadh se Vishwas Act, 2020. He submitted, after receiving the certificates issued by the designated authority in form 3, the assessee has also paid the tax due and submitted form 4. However, he submitted, assessee has not 2 M/s Nahar Gems yet received form 5. Letters dated 09-03-2021 to this effect attaching copies of form 3 have also been furnished before the bench.
3. I have heard the parties and perused the materials on record. It is a fact that the assesee has opted for settling the dispute arising in these appeals under the Direct tax Vivadh se Vishwas Act, 2020 and has received form 3 issued by the designated authority and paid the taxes and furnished form 4. Under these circumstances, it is not necessary to keep these appeals pending. Accordingly, I deem it appropriate to dismiss these appeals as withdrawn. However, if for any unforeseen reasons, assessee’s declarations under the Vivadh se Vishwas scheme, ultimately, are not accepted by the department by issuing form 5, liberty is granted to the assessee to seek restoration of these appeals.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026