DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S BROADCOM INDIA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee. This dismissal was based on the assessee's decision to settle the matter under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted to settle the tax disputes under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. This led to the withdrawal of appeals filed by both the assessee and the Revenue. The tribunal was informed of this settlement.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the resolution of tax disputes under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, leading to the withdrawal and subsequent dismissal of appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “B”, BANGALORE
O R D E R Per Bench : These are cross appeals against two orders of the Assessing Officer passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) of the I.T.Act (order dated 18.01.2016 for A.Y. 2011-2012 & order dated 07.08.2017 for A.Y. 2013-2014). The relevant assessment years are 2011-2012 and 2013-2014.
The assessee during the course of hearing had submitted vide letter dated 19th March, 2021, that it has opted for setting
2 IT(TP)A No.483/Bang/2016 & Ors. M/s.LSI India Research & Development Pvt.Ltd.. the matter under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and prayed the appeals may be treated as withdrawn with the liberty to the assessee and Revenue to recall the same, if required.
In view of the submissions of the learned AR and learned DR, we dismiss these appeals as withdrawn, since the assessee wants to settle the matter under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. There are two Departmental appeals also, which are withdrawn. If the assessee is not pursuing the matter under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, it shall intimate the Department, so that the Department shall file necessary application for recalling the present order.
In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and assessee are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026