DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SAYYAPARAJU VIJAYA RAMA RAJU, VISAKHAPATNAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 252/VIZ/2018Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 October 2018AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Circular No. 03/2018, appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 20 lakhs are not maintainable before the ITAT. Therefore, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed.

What were the facts?

The revenue filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The tax effect involved in these appeals was below Rs. 20 lakhs.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the maintainability of the revenue's appeals before the ITAT based on the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

N/A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO& SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH

For Appellant: Shri Waseem UR Rehman, DR
Hearing: 08.10.2018

Per Bench: These appeals are filed by the revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) [CIT(A)]-10, Hyderabad vide I.T.A.No.0082/CIT(A)-10/2017-18/CIT(A), Hyd-10/10216/2017-18 and ITA No.0129/CIT(A)-10/2017-18/CIT(A), Hyd-10/10173/2017-18 dated 16.03.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14 and 2014-15 respectively.

Shri Sayyaparaju Vijaya Rama Raju, Visakhapatnam

2.

When these appeals are taken up for hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the tax effect involved in these appeals is below Rs.20 lakhs. As per the latest circular No. 03/2018, dated 11.07.2018 10.12.2015 of CBDT being retrospective in nature, which is in supersession of its Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, in relation to filing of appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable. The Ld. D.R. has not raised any objection. In view of the above, the appeals filed by the revenue are not maintainable. Hence, the same are dismissed.

3.

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed.

The above order was pronounced in the open court on 10th October, 2018. (धड.एस. सुन्दर ससह) (िी.दुगाा राि) (V. DURGA RAO) (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER धिशाखापटणम /Visakhapatnam ददिांक /Dated : 10.10.2018 L.Rama, SPS Shri Sayyaparaju Vijaya Rama Raju, Visakhapatnam

आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- ननर्ााररती/ The Assessee- Shri Sayyaparaju Vijaya Rama Raju, 50-121- 1. 49/1/10/4B, Geethika Residency, B S Layout, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam 2. राजस्व/ The Revenue – DCIT, Circle-3(1), Visakhapatnam

3.

The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam

4.

The Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-10, Hyderabad 5. धिभागीय प्रधिधिधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम /DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गाडाफ़ाईल / Guard file आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER ////

Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →