DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. NAVABHARAT ENTERPRISES LIMITED, HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had settled all tax arrears under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was rendered infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11. The assessee subsequently filed Form 5 under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020, settling all tax arrears.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable when the assessee has settled its tax dues under a settlement scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Rao
O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, J.M. This Revenue’s appeal for A.Y 2010-11 arises from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 4, Hyderabad’s order dated 07.06.2019 in case No.10989/JCIT(OSD), Cir. 16(1)/18-19/CIT(A)- 4/Hyd/19-20 involving proceedings under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”).
Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. We accordingly proceeded ex-parte against the assessee.
It transpires during the course of hearing that the assessee’s cover letter dt.15.02.2022 has filed Form 5 u/s 5 r.w.s. 6 of the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’ thereby making it clear to have settled all the tax arrears amounting to Rs.46,61,078/-. This form further states the instant main appeal details as well. That being the case, we treat the Revenue’s all substantive grievances averred in the instant appeal to have been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly.
This Revenue’s appeal is dismissed as rendered infructuous in above terms.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 18th February, 2022.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026