M/S. SIEMENS LIMITED (SUCCESSOR IN THE INTEREST TO M/S. SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS LTD.),,MUMBAI vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in view of the assessee's choice.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). Subsequently, the assessee filed an application under the 'Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024' and received Form No. 2 from the Designated Authority.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn on opting for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL
(Assessment Year: 2008-09) Siemens Limited The Assistant Commissioner Vs. (Successor in interest to of Income-tax, Siemens Healthcare Circle-2(1)(1), Diagnostics Ltd.) Vadodara 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400018 [PAN : AAACB 8542 M] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Ms. Pooja Bhattacharjee, AR Respondent by: Shri Yogesh Mishra, Sr DR Date of Hearing 07.01.2025 Date of Pronouncement 16.01.2025 O R D E R PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT :
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Vadodara (hereinafter referred to as "CIT(A)" for short) dated 31.08.2016 passed under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short], for Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09.
At the outset, it was brought to the notice of the bench by the Ld. AR that the assessee has filed application under the “Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024”. She also submitted that, in response thereto, the assessee received Form No. 2 issued by the Designated Authority. The Ld. AR, therefore, sought permission to withdraw its appeal vide letter dated 06.12.2024 which is placed on record along with Form No.2 issued by the Designated Authority.
Keeping in view the choice of the assessee to opt for the scheme, the appeal of the assessee is being dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
The order is pronounced in the open Court on 16.01.2025
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026