Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI RAVISH SOOD
ORDER PER RAVISH SOOD, J.M: The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-53, Mumbai, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed by the A.O under Sec. 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated Nil for assessment year 2015-16.
The assessee’s counsel has filed a letter, wherein it is stated that she had filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 in order to settle the aforesaid matter pending before the Tribunal. It is stated by the assessee that she had received “Form 3” from the designated authority on 07.12.2020 (copy enclosed). It is further stated by her that the balance outstanding amount of Rs.27,49,688/- had been deposited by her vide challan no. 0001, dated 31.03.2021 (copy enclosed). It is stated by the assessee that in the backdrop of the aforesaid facts the captioned appeal may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The ld. D.R did not controvert the aforesaid factual position as was canvassed before us.
2 Kusum Jagdish Gupta Vs. Dy. CIT, CC-5(1) 4. In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, subject to a rider that in the unlikely event of the matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme the assessee shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of her appeal. 5. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject to the observation recorded hereinabove. Order pronounced in the open court on 08/06/2021.