MAYANK MADHUKANT PATEL,ANAND vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4, ANANN
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA
PER SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, AM:
These two appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short
‘the CIT(A)’), dated 26.05.2023 in ITA No.1285/Ahd/2024 and against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal),
Ahmedabad-13, dated 10.06.2024 in the ITA No.1290/Ahd/2024, both for the Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. At the time of hearing of both appeals of the assessee, Shri
Chetan Agarwal Ld. AR of the assessee informed that the assessee had opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme,
2024, which was accepted by the Ld. PCIT. Therefore, he
ITA Nos. 1285 & 1290/Ahd/2024 - A.Y. 2011-12
[Mayank Madhukant Patel vs. ITO] - 2 –
requested for leave to withdraw the two appeals. A letter dated
11.12.2024 has also been filed by the assesse to this effect. Ld.
Departmental Representative for the Revenue did not express any objection in this regard. Accordingly, the request of the assessee for withdrawal of two appeals is allowed.
In the result, both appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
This Order pronounced on 28/01/2025 (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ahmedabad; Dated 28/01/2025
S. K. SINHAआदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथȸ / The Appellant
2. Ĥ×यथȸ / The Respondent.
3. संबंͬधत आयकर आयुÈत / Concerned CIT
4. आयकर आयुÈत(अपील) / The CIT(A)-
5. ͪवभागीय ĤǓतǓनͬध, आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad
6. गाड[ फाईल / Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.