KARMDEEP FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 467/AHD/2024Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 February 2025Bench: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

During the hearing, it was brought to the Tribunal's attention that the CIT(E) had subsequently granted Section 12AB(1)(b) registration to the assessee for Assessment Years 2022-23 to 2026-27. Considering this new development, the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for a fresh de-novo consideration after providing the assessee with a due opportunity of hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Karmadeep Foundation, applied for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) rejected the application, stating that a valid registration under Section 12(1)(ac)(iii) or Section 12A/12AB of the Act was a prerequisite for granting 80G(5) approval, which the trust lacked at the time of rejection.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the assessee's application for exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the grounds of lacking a prerequisite registration under Section 12A/12AB.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G(5),Section 80G(5)(iii),Section 80G(5)(iv),Section 12(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12A,Section 12AB,Section 12AB(1)(b)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE

For Appellant: Shri Pritesh L. Shah, CA
For Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR
Hearing: 16.01.2025Pronounced: 14.02.2025

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment Year: - NA) Karmadeep Foundation, Commissioner of Vs. E-8, Revati Tower, Income-Tax (Exemptions), Ramdevnagar, Jodhpur Cross Ahmedabad Roads, Satellite, Ahmedabad - 380015 [PAN : AAETK 5066 A (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Pritesh L. Shah, CA Respondent by: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 16.01.2025 Date of Pronouncement 14.02.2025 O R D E R PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:-

Delay condoned

2.

This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad (in short ‘the CIT(E)’) dated 28.05.2023, rejecting the application of the assessee under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short].

3.

The solitary grievance raised by the assessee is as follows:-

“The learned CIT Exemption, Ahmedabad erred in rejecting the application seeking the exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, such rejection is requested to be deleted.”

Karmadeep Foundation Vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : - - 2–

4.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed application for approval of the trust under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Act in Form No. 10AB on 04.11.2022. Subsequently, the assessee was asked to furnish documents in response to the notice sent to the assessee regarding the activities carried out by the assessee-trust, which according to the Ld. CIT(E), as the mandatory provisions of the procedure for approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act. On perusal of the details available with Ld. CIT(E), he observed that the assessee has mentioned the date of incorporation/creation/registration of the trust as 05.03.2007 and the assessee had been granted order for provisional approval in Form No. 10AC issued on 28.05.2021 u/s 80G(5)(iv) of the Act for the period commencing from 08.05.2021 to AY 2024-25. The Ld. CIT(E) observed that as per section 80G(5)(iii) of the Act, the assessee was required to file application in Form No. 10AB at least six months prior to expiry of period of the provisional approval or within six months of commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier. The Ld. CIT(E), after considering the submissions of the assessee-trust, held that the approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act could not be granted for the reason that the trust does not have any valid order for registration u/s 12(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act in Form No. 10AD. He also held that valid registration u/s 12A/12AB of the Act is a prerequisite and in the absence of the same, approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act could not be granted to the assessee-trust.

5.

Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee is now in appeal before the Tribunal.

Karmadeep Foundation Vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : - - 3–

6.

At the time of hearing, Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) granted 12AB(1)(b) Registration vide order dated 20.01.2024 for the Assessment Years 2022-23 to 2026-27, which is placed on record at page no. 8 to 10 of the paper-book. Ld. DR could not controvert the factual submission made by the ld. Counsel for the assessee; however, submitted that the issue may be restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for de-novo consideration. Accordingly, looking into the instant facts, the matter is restored to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for de-novo consideration, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee, and thereafter pass order in accordance with law.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 80G(5)

All 2,236 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →