← Back to search

KARMDEEP FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

PDF
ITA 467/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 February 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE

For Appellant: Shri Pritesh L. Shah, CA
For Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR
Hearing: 16.01.2025Pronounced: 14.02.2025

PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:-

Delay condoned

2.

This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad (in short ‘the CIT(E)’) dated 28.05.2023, rejecting the application of the assessee under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short].

3.

The solitary grievance raised by the assessee is as follows:-

“The learned CIT Exemption, Ahmedabad erred in rejecting the application seeking the exemption under Section 80G of the Income
Tax Act, 1961, such rejection is requested to be deleted.”
Asst. Year : -
- 2–

4.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed application for approval of the trust under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Act in Form No. 10AB on 04.11.2022. Subsequently, the assessee was asked to furnish documents in response to the notice sent to the assessee regarding the activities carried out by the assessee-trust, which according to the Ld. CIT(E), as the mandatory provisions of the procedure for approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act. On perusal of the details available with Ld. CIT(E), he observed that the assessee has mentioned the date of incorporation/creation/registration of the trust as 05.03.2007 and the assessee had been granted order for provisional approval in Form No. 10AC issued on 28.05.2021 u/s 80G(5)(iv) of the Act for the period commencing from 08.05.2021 to AY 2024-25. The Ld. CIT(E) observed that as per section 80G(5)(iii) of the Act, the assessee was required to file application in Form No. 10AB at least six months prior to expiry of period of the provisional approval or within six months of commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier. The Ld. CIT(E), after considering the submissions of the assessee-trust, held that the approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act could not be granted for the reason that the trust does not have any valid order for registration u/s 12(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act in Form No. 10AD. He also held that valid registration u/s 12A/12AB of the Act is a prerequisite and in the absence of the same, approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act could not be granted to the assessee-trust.

5.

Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee is now in appeal before the Tribunal. Asst. Year : - - 3– 6. At the time of hearing, Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) granted 12AB(1)(b) Registration vide order dated 20.01.2024 for the Assessment Years 2022-23 to 2026-27, which is placed on record at page no. 8 to 10 of the paper-book. Ld. DR could not controvert the factual submission made by the ld. Counsel for the assessee; however, submitted that the issue may be restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for de-novo consideration. Accordingly, looking into the instant facts, the matter is restored to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for de-novo consideration, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee, and thereafter pass order in accordance with law.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

The order is pronounced in the open Court on 14.02.2025 (SUCHITRA KAMBLE)
VICE-PRESIDENT

Ahmedabad; Dated 14/02/2025

btk

आदेश की ितिलिप अ ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant
2.  थ / The Respondent.
3. संबंिधतआयकरआयु / Concerned CIT
4. आयकरआयु(अपील) / The CIT(A)-
5. िवभागीयितिनिध, आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, अहमदाबाद/ DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad
6. गाड फाईल/ Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

KARMDEEP FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD | BharatTax