Facts
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 120 days, citing educational limitations, being a retired person, and ill-health as reasons. The CIT(A) refused to condone the delay, dismissing the appeal without adjudicating on merits.
Held
The Tribunal held that dismissing the appeal solely on the point of limitation without adjudicating the merits, and without giving proper opportunity of hearing, is against the Principle of Natural Justice. Therefore, the matter was set aside to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal on limitation without adjudicating the merits and providing proper opportunity of hearing.
Sections Cited
143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH
Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar
Assessment Year 2016-17 Sharadbhai Keshavlal Income Tax Officer Lakhani Ward-7(2)(1) C/o M S Chhajed & Co. Vs (Old Ward-7(2)(3)), CA, “Kamal Shanti” Ahmedabad Nr. Sardar Patel Statue, Ahmedabad-380014 Gujarat PAN: AAGPL9609J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Shri M S Chhajed, A.R. Revenue Represented: Shri Waghe Prasadrao, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing : 26-02-2025 Date of pronouncement : 27-02-2025 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the appellate order dated 17.04.2023 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (in short referred to as “CIT(A)”), arising out of the assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2016-17.
A.Y. 2016-17 Page No 2 Sharadbhai Keshavlal Lakhani VS. ITO
There is a delay of 120 days in filing the appeal before Ld. CIT(A) wherein it was explained by the assessee that he has studied upto 7th Standard only, not much conversation with the computers and being a retired person residing at his native place Village Tarvada Taluka, Amreli District and also because of ill-health the delay in filing the above appeal before Ld. CIT(A). This reason was not found to be a “reasonable cause” to condone the delay, thereby Ld. CIT(A) refused to condone the delay and dismissed the appeal without giving proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. But only one opportunity of hearing on 22-01-2021 was given to the assessee, wherein the assessee filed a written submission on merits of the case. But without adjudicating the merits of the case, ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, but only on the point of limitation, which in our considered opinion is against the Principle of Natural Justice. Therefore we deem it fit to set aside the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits of the case by giving proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27-02-2025 Sd/- Sd/- (MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR) (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad : Dated 27/02/2025 आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue A.Y. 2016-17 Page No 3 Sharadbhai Keshavlal Lakhani VS. ITO