Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘G‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI M.BALAGANESH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): This appeal in A.Y.2013-14 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-8/IT-495/15-16 dated 05/02/2018 ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 30/11/2015 by the ld. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax 3(1)(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
M/s. Ganita Technologies & Services Pvt. Ltd.,
We find that the ld. AR filed a letter mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter. Ld. DR also agreed that the Form -3 has been received.
In view of this, we hereby treat the appeal pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 15/06/2021 by way of proper mentioning in the notice board.
Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (M.BALAGANESH) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 15/06/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
M/s. Ganita Technologies & Services Pvt. Ltd.,