PARKER HANNIFIN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ASST. CIT - 1(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute through the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' and requested the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee had filed an appeal before the ITAT. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle the dispute. The assessee then requested the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee after opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘J‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICILA MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): This appeal in A.Y.2008-09 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-15/Arr.260/ACIT-1(2)/13-14 dated 20/02/2014 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13)of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 30/01/2012 by the ld. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
M/s. Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd.,
We find that assessee had settled the dispute arising for the year by availing ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme’. The assessee vide letter dated 16/04/2021 had requested for withdrawal of the said appeal. This fact is further confirmed by the assessee by its email dated 12/07/2021. In view of the same, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in open Court on 13/07/2021.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026