CENTURY TRADESERVE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. NFAC, DELHI PRESENT JURISDICTION THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(3), AHMEDABAD
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. BRR KUMAR & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER: DR. BRR KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the penalty order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)/National Appeal Centre vide order dated 29.01.2022
passed for the Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that he has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and consequently requested that his application for withdrawal of Asst.Year –2012-13
- 2–
appeal may please be granted. The assessee has filed Form No.1
under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. 3. The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
4. In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned parties, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 12.01.2025 (SUCHITRA KAMBLE)
VICE PRESIDENT
()
Ahmedabad; Dated 12.01.2025
Manish, Sr. PSITA No. 1821/Ahd/2024
Asst.Year –2012-13
- 3–
आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयुᲦ / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयुᲦ(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय ᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाडᭅ फाईल / Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.