MALAY CORPORATE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. BRR KUMAR & Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLEAssessment Year: 2012-13
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against order dated 29.02.2024, passed by the CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the Assessment
Years 2012-13. 2. The Ld. AR sought adjournment which is rejected. As per letter dated
10.03.2025, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad
Se Vishwas Scheme and filed Form No.1 under the said Scheme and hence requesting to withdraw the appeal once Form No.2 is issued.
3. In the light of this, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event the assessee fails to avail the benefit of DTVSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before the Tribunal in accordance with law.
Assessment Year: 2012-13
PBN/*
Copies to:
(1)
The appellant
(2)
The respondent
(3)
CIT
(4)
CIT(A)
(5)
Departmental Representative
(6)
Guard File
By order