QUALITY TEA PLANTATIONS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-4(4), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee's grievances had been resolved by a subsequent assessment order. Since the respondent had no objection, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2015-16. During the hearing, the assessee's representative did not appear. The assessee had filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn, given that the assessee's grievances were resolved by a subsequent order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal]
ORDER
Per Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member :
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. Pr.CIT-2, Kolkata dated 11.05.2020 for AY 2015-16 vide order No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2020- 21/1027073050(1) against the assessment order passed by ITO, Ward-4(4), Kolkata u/s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) dated 07.07.2017.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing though an application for withdrawal of the appeal is placed in file. In the said application the assessee has prayed before the bench to withdraw the above appeal as its grievances have been resolved by the assessment order dated 22.03.2022 passed by the AO u/s. 143(3) read with section 263 read with section 144B of the Act. The Ld. DR has got no objection in respect of the above prayer of the assessee. Since the grievance of the assessee has been resolved by the assessment order dated 22.03.2022 passed by the AO u/s. 143(3) read with section 263 read with section 144B of the Act, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee being withdrawn. 8. In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd.- (Sanjay Garg) (Girish Agrawal) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 27.04.2022
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026