AARTI TEJASH LODHAVIA,MUMBAI vs. ITO (IT)-3(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT, which was delayed. The assessee had also opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' to settle the dispute.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI M.BALAGANESH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.2014-15 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-57, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-57/Arr.550/2018-19 dated 09/08/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 27/12/2017 by the ld. Income Tax Officer (IT)-3(1)(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
At the outset we find that there is a delay of 131 days in filing of appeal by the assessee before this Tribunal. We find that this Tribunal by ways of a separate interim order dated 18/12/2020 had condoned the delay and admitted the appeal for adjudication on merits.
We find that assessee had preferred an application under ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ and had settled the dispute thereon. The copy of Form No.3 was also received by the assessee which is already on record. In view of the same, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 28/06/2021 by way of proper mentioning in the notice board.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026