JAMIAT ULAMA-E-RELIEF FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4647/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 June 2021AY 2012-143 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the registration under Section 12A was rejected without affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. This procedural lapse necessitates a review of the CIT(E)'s decision.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Jamiat Ulama-E-Relief Foundation, filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(E) for AY 2012-13. The primary issue raised by the assessee concerns the rejection of its registration under Section 12A.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the assessee's registration under Section 12A without providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to present its case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH

For Appellant: Shri Haridas Bhatt, A.R
For Respondent: Shri S. Purushottam Tripuri, D.R
Hearing: 31.03.2021Pronounced: 28.06.2021

Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member:

1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 14.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(E)] relevant to assessment year 2012-13.

2.

The assessee in various grounds of appeal has raised the issue of rejection of registration under section 12A of the Act without granting reasonable opportunity to the assessee.

3.

The facts in brief are that the trust was constituted by memorandum of association dated 29.06.2011 and duly registered with Assistant Registrar of Societies, Mumbai on 2 M/s. Jamiat Ulama-E-Relief Foundation 08.08.2011 and also with charity Commissioner, Mumbai on 17.11.2011. Subsequently, the trust filed an application for registration under section 12A with Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, however, the same was rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) vide order dated 30.09.2013 passed under section 12AA(1)(b)(ii). The various decisions cited for rejection of the application inter alia include providing financial assistance in the form of financial aid, seed capital venture which was considered a commercial object, source of fund not proved by the assessee and membership being given to particular religious community and finally the assessee is providing legal help to accused of several terrorist activities which is not held to be charitable in nature.

4.

After hearing both the parties and perusing the material on record, we observe that the Ld. CIT(E) has gone into the source of funds and application thereof without ascertaining the genuineness of the objects of the trust. We are, therefore, of the opinion that Ld. CIT(E) needs to examine the genuineness of the trust on the basis of aims and objectives of the trust and accordingly consider the issue of granting registration under section 12A. We are, therefore, of the considered view that the ends of justice would be met, if the issue is restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) to consider the issue afresh and denovo after taking into account the objects of the assessee and also the various evidences which may be filed by the assessee before Ld. CIT(E) and then decide the issue on the merits of the case. Accordingly, we set aside the order of Ld. CIT(E).

Order pronounced in the open court on 28.06.2021.

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →