M/S ACUITY STRATEGIC FINANCIALS PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 12(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal accepted the assessee's submission regarding the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek restoration if the scheme declaration is not accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee had opted for settlement of dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The assessee submitted letters to the tribunal indicating this settlement and received Form No. 3 from the appropriate authority.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI
भहावीय ससिंह, उऩाध्मऺ के द्वाया / PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP:
This appeal of assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)]-20, Mumbai, [in short CIT(A)], in appeal No. CIT(A)-20/IT-10056/2017-18 dated 30.04.2019. The assessment was framed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-12(1)(2), Mumbai under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Acuity Strategic Financials Pvt. Ltd.; AY 09-10 The registry placed on record assessee’s letters dated 18th March, 2. 2021 wherein it has been submitted that the assessee has already opted for settlement of dispute for both the assessment years under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme), 2020 and received Form No.3 from appropriate authority. The Ld. DR submitted that the appeal may be dismissed.
In view of foregoing, the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to assessee to seek restoration of the appeals in case the aforesaid declaration filed under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 01.07.2021. (एभ. फारगणेश / M. BALAGANESH) (भहावीय ससिंह /MAHAVIR SINGH) (रेखा सदस्म / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (उऩाध्मऺ / VICE PRESIDENT) भुिंफई, ददनािंक/ Mumbai, Dated: 01.07.2021 सुदीऩ सयकाय, व. ननजी सचिव/ Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS Acuity Strategic Financials Pvt. Ltd.; AY 09-10 आदेश की प्रतिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीराथी / The Appellant 1. 2. प्रत्मथी / The Respondent. 3. आमकय आमुक्त(अऩीर) / The CIT(A) आमकय आमुक्त / CIT 4. ववबागीम प्रनतननचध, आमकय अऩीरीम अचधकयण, भुिंफई /
DR, ITAT, Mumbai गार्ा पाईर / Guard file. 6. आदेशान सार/ BY ORDER, सत्मावऩत प्रनत //// उप/सहायक पुंजीकार /Asstt.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026