APARNA YEDULA,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-4(3), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the lower appellate order was passed ex-parte during the pandemic without hearing the assessee. Therefore, the case was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2017-18 arose from an addition of Rs. 11,10,161 made under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE. The CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order during the Covid-19 pandemic without hearing the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex-parte during Covid-19 pandemic without hearing the assessee is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘ SMC ’ BENCH, HYDERABAD.
Before: SHRI S.S. GODARA
O R D E R This assessee’s appeal for the Asst. Year 2017-18 arise from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi’s order dt.05.11.2021 passed in the case No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1036738603(1) involving proceedings under Section 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’).
None appeared on behalf of the assessee, therefore, case was heard exparte. Heard learned DR.
2 ITA 36/Hyd/2022 2. The assessee's sole substantive grievance herein challenge both the lower authorities’ action making 69A r.w.s. 115BBE addition of Rs.11,10,161 in the course of section 144 proceedings as upheld in the CIT(A)’s exparte order.
There is hardly any dispute that the lower appellate order under challenge has been passed during Covid 19 pandemic outbreak involving lockdown restrictions at various levels; and that too, without hearing the assessee. Faced with this situation, I deem it appropriate to restore the instant appeal back to the CIT(A) for his appropriate adjudication in light of section 250(6) of the Act within three effective opportunities of hearing.
This assessee's appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026