M/S BHANDERI CORPORATION LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY. CIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
Both the assessee and the revenue confirmed that all taxes have been paid under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee and revenue filed cross-appeals before the ITAT. The assessee had availed the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' and paid all the taxes due.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the status of the appeals given the assessee's participation in the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and payment of taxes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B‘ BENCH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): These cross appeals in 1970/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2011-12 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-47, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-47/12847/2016-17 dated 28/01/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 30/12/2016 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle- 1(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO). 2. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee Dr. K. Shivaram submitted that assessee had availed ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and already paid all the taxes. 3. Ld. DR Shri Rahul Raman also confirmed that all taxes have been paid. The ld. DR at the time of hearing submitted that he had sought a report from the Assessing Officer and in this regard, he has also confirmed the same. Accordingly, the appeals of the assessee and revenue are dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In the result, appeal of the assessee and appeal of the Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 14/07/2021 Sd/- Sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 14/07/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps 1970/Mum/2019 M/s. Bhanderi Corporation Ltd., Copy of the Order forwarded to : The Appellant 1. The Respondent. 2. The CIT(A), Mumbai. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. 6. Guard file. //True Copy//
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026