THE GUJARAT SALES TAX BAR MEMBERS BENEVOLENT SCHEME,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, EXEMPTION, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the delay in filing Form 10B was condoned by the CIT under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, the impugned order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee was denied deduction under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act due to late filing of the audit report in Form 10B. The CIT had condoned the delay in filing Form 10B.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 11 when the delay in filing Form 10B was condoned by the CIT?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg
आदेश/ORDER
The present appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Maysore [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)’] dated 22.10.2024 arising from the assessment order passed u/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as “the Act”) relevant to the Assessment Year 2016-17.
The assessee was denied deduction u/s. 11 of the Income Tax Act because of late filing of audit report in Form 10B. The ld. counsel has produced the copy of order passed u/s. 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax, whereby, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax has condoned the delay in the case of the assessee for delay in filing Form 10B. In view of this, the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of Assessing Officer to pass afresh assessment order after taking into consideration condonation of the delay in filing the Form 10B by the ld. CIT vide his order dated 19th May, 2010.
With the above observations, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026