Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI M.BALAGANESH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): This appeal in A.Y.2011-12 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-17/IT-74/15-16 dated 30/07/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 13/03/2015 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10(2)(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
M/s. Mettler-Toledo India Pvt. Ltd.,
We find that the assessee filed a letter dated 13/05/2021 mentioning that an application had been preferred under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat the appeal pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in open Court on 19/07/2021
Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (M.BALAGANESH) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 19/07/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
M/s. Mettler-Toledo India Pvt. Ltd.,