No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE
आदेश / O R D E R PER G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre,
Delhi, dated 24.05.2021 and pertains to assessment year 2014-15.
We find that appeal filed by assessee is barred by limitation for which
necessary petition for condonation of delay of 116 days explaining the
reasons for the delay has been filed. The learned counsel submitted that
assessee could not file appeal within the time allowed under the Act,
therefore delay may be condoned. Having heard both sides and considered
ITA No.498/Chny/2021 :: 2 ::
the petition filed by the assessee for condonation of delay of 116 days, we
are of the considered view that reasons given by assessee for not filing the
appeal within the time allowed under the Act comes under reasonable cause
as provided under the Act for condonation of delay of 116 days and hence,
delay in filing of above appeal is condoned and appeal filed by the assessee
is admitted for adjudication.
Brief facts of the case are that for the financial year 2013-14, the
assessee has filed TDS Quarterly returns in Form 26Q (on 31.01.2015 &
Form 24Q (on 24.12.2016) beyond due date specified under the Act. The
Assessing Officer has assessed TDS quarterly returns filed by the assessee
under section 200A and levied late filing fee under section 234E of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] for the delay in filing the said
statements for all the assessment year. The assessee has challenged the
levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Act before the learned
CIT(A). After considering the submissions of the assessee, the ld. CIT(A)
dismissed the appeal.
We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on
record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The solitary issue
that needs to be resolved in the given facts and circumstances of the case
is whether the Assessing Officer can levy late fee prescribed under section
234E of the Act, when the quarterly return filed by the tax deductor for the
period prior to 01.06.2015, when the law has been amended by Finance
Act enabling the Assessing Officer to compute late fee while processing TDS
ITA No.498/Chny/2021 :: 3 ::
returns under section 200A of the Act. The provisions of section 234E of
the Act, has been inserted to the statute by Finance Act with effect from
01.07.2012 and provides levy of late fee for belated filing of quarterly
return filed by the tax deductor. The Assessing Officer started levying of
late fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while processing
quarterly TDS return and started issuing intimation to the assessees. The
issue has been challenged before various Courts by the assessees by Writ
and challenged the validity of provision of section 234E of the Act. In some
cases, some Courts have granted stay of operation of intimation issued by
the Department under section 200A of the Act. Therefore, on the basis of
judgement of the Hon’ble High Court, the assessees have started
challenging the intimation issued by the Assessing Officer before the ld.
CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) did not entertain the appeal filed by the assessee on
both counts, including on limitation in filing the appeal as well as on merits
of the issue and rejected the arguments taken by the assessee and
confirmed late fee levied under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, as per
mandate of the statute. In the meantime, the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court
in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi v. Union of India [2016] 289 CTR 602
(Karnataka) had considered the issue and after analyzing the provisions of
section 234E of the Act and section 200A of the Act and held that in the
absence of enabling provision in section 200A of the Act, the Assessing
Officer cannot levy late fee under section 234E of the Act, while processing
the quarterly TDS return filed for the period of the respective assessment
ITA No.498/Chny/2021 :: 4 ::
years prior to 01.06.2015. A similar view has been expressed by the
Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd.
v. Union of India [2022] 134 taxmann.com 111 (Kerala) after considering
the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi
v. Union of India [2016] 289 CTR 602 (Karnataka) and held that the
provisions of section 200A of the Act were mandated to enable computation
of late fee payable under section 234E of the Act, at the time of processing
of quarterly TDS return and the said amendment came into effect from
01.06.2015. Thus, the intimation issued by the Assessing Officer under
section 200A of the Act to levy late fee for belated return for the period
prior to 01.06.2015 is invalid. Subsequent to the decisions of the Hon’ble
Karnataka High Court and the Hon’ble Kerala High Court, series of decisions
have been rendered by various Benches of the Tribunal and held that late
fee under section 234E of the Act, cannot be levied for the period prior to
01.06.2015, because, there was no enabling provision to levy such late fee.
In the present appeal, on perusal of the facts, we find that the
assessment year involved is prior to 01.06.2015. Therefore, we are of the
considered view that the late fee charged by the Assessing Officer under
section 234E of the Act, while processing quarterly TDS return under
section 200A of the Act, is without any authority and invalid. Hence, by
respectfully following the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in
the case of Fatheraj Singhvi v. Union of India [2016] 289 CTR 602
(Karnataka), we are of the considered view that the Assessing Officer
ITA No.498/Chny/2021 :: 5 ::
cannot levy late fee while processing of TDS return under section 200A of
the Act up to the financial year 2013-14. Since, late fee charged in the
present case pertaining to the financial year 2013-14, we direct the
Assessing Officer to delete the late fee charged under section 234E of the
Act in the intimation issued under section 200A of the Act for the processing
of quarterly TDS return filed by the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced on the 24th day of February, 2022, in Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (वी. दुगा� राव) (जी. मंजूनाथा) (G. MANJUNATHA) (V. DURGA RAO) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �याियक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 24th February, 2022. TLN, Sr.PS आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 4. आयकर आयु�/CIT 2. ��यथ�/Respondent 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 3. आयकर आयु� (अपील)/CIT(A) 6. गाड� फाईल/GF