No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE
आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order of
the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal
Centre, Delhi, dated 31.03.2021 and pertains to assessment years 2013-
14 to 2015-16.
We find that appeals filed by assessee are barred by limitation for
which necessary petition for condonation of delay of 73 days explaining the
reasons for the delay has been filed. The learned counsel submitted that
assessee could not file appeals within the time allowed under the Act,
therefore delay may be condoned. Having heard both sides and considered
ITA Nos.284-286/Chny/2021 :: 2 ::
the petition filed by the assessee for condonation of delay of 73 days, we
are of the considered view that reasons given by assessee for not filing the
appeals within the time allowed under the Act comes under reasonable
cause as provided under the Act for condonation of delay of 33 days and
hence, delay in filing of above appeals are condoned and appeals filed by
the assessee are admitted for adjudication.
Brief facts of the case are that for the financial years 2012-13 to
2014-15, the assessee has filed TDS beyond due date specified under the
Act. The Assessing Officer has assessed TDS quarterly returns filed by the
assessee under section 200A and levied late filing fee under section 234E
of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] for the delay in filing the said
statements for all the assessment years. The assessee has challenged the
levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Act before the learned
CIT(A). After considering the submissions of the assessee, the ld. CIT(A)
dismissed the appeals.
We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on
record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The solitary issue
that needs to be resolved in the given facts and circumstances of the case
is whether the Assessing Officer can levy late fee prescribed under section
234E of the Act, when the quarterly return filed by the tax deductor for the
period prior to 01.06.2015, when the law has been amended by Finance
Act enabling the Assessing Officer to compute late fee while processing TDS
returns under section 200A of the Act. The provisions of section 234E of
ITA Nos.284-286/Chny/2021 :: 3 ::
the Act has been inserted to the statute by Finance Act with effect from
01.07.2012 and provides levy of late fee for belated filing of quarterly
return filed by the tax deductor. The Assessing Officer started levying of
late fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while processing
quarterly TDS return and started issuing intimation to the assessees. The
issue has been challenged before various Courts by the assessees by writ
and challenged the validity of provision of section 234E of the Act. In some
cases, some Courts have granted stay of operation of intimation issued by
the Department under section 200A of the Act. Therefore, on the basis of
judgement of the Hon’ble High Court, the assessees have started
challenging the intimation issued by the Assessing Officer before the ld.
CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) did not entertain the appeal filed by the assessee on
both counts, including on limitation in filing the appeal as well as on merits
of the issue and rejected the arguments taken by the assessee and
confirmed late fee levied under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, as per
mandate of the statute. In the meantime, the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court
in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi v. Union of India [2016] 289 CTR 602
(Karnataka) had considered the issue and after analyzing the provisions of
section 234E of the Act and section 200A of the Act and held that in the
absence of enabling provision in section 200A of the Act, the Assessing
Officer cannot levy late fee under section 234E of the Act, while processing
the quarterly TDS return filed for the period of the respective assessment
years prior to 01.06.2015. A similar view has been expressed by the
ITA Nos.284-286/Chny/2021 :: 4 ::
Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd.
v. Union of India [2022] 134 taxmann.com 111 (Kerala) after considering
the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi
v. Union of India [2016] 289 CTR 602 (Karnataka) and held that the
provisions of section 200A of the Act were mandated to enable computation
of late fee payable under section 234E of the Act, at the time of processing
of quarterly TDS return and the said amendment came into effect from
01.06.2015. Thus, the intimation issued by the Assessing Officer under
section 200A of the Act to levy late fee for belated return for the period
prior to 01.06.2015 is invalid. Subsequent to the decisions of the Hon’ble
Karnataka High Court and the Hon’ble Kerala High Court, series of decisions
have been rendered by various Benches of the Tribunal and held that late
fee under section 234E of the Act cannot be levied for the period prior to
01.06.2015, because, there was no enabling provision to levy such late fee.
In the present appeals, on perusal of the facts, we find that the
assessment years involved are prior to 01.06.2015. Therefore, we are of
the considered view that the late fee charged by the Assessing Officer under
section 234E of the Act, while processing quarterly TDS return under
section 200A of the Act, is without any authority and invalid. Hence, by
respectfully following the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in
the case of Fatheraj Singhvi v. Union of India [2016] 289 CTR 602
(Karnataka), we are of the considered view that the Assessing Officer
cannot levy late fee while processing of TDS return under section 200A of
ITA Nos.284-286/Chny/2021 :: 5 ::
the Act up to the financial years 2012-13 to 2014-15. Since, late fee
charged in the present case pertaining to the financial years 2012-13 to
2014-15, we direct the Assessing Officer to delete the late fee charged
under section 234E of the Act in the intimation issued under section 200A
of the Act for the processing of quarterly TDS return filed by the assessee.
In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed.
Order pronounced on the 24th day of February, 2022, in Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (वी. दुगा� राव) (जी. मंजूनाथा) (G. MANJUNATHA) (V. DURGA RAO) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �याियक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 24th February, 2022. TLN, Sr.PS आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 4. आयकर आयु�/CIT 2. ��यथ�/Respondent 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 3. आयकर आयु� (अपील)/CIT(A) 6. गाड� फाईल/GF