No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI M.BALAGANESH,
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.2015-16 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Mumbai in appeal No.10217-THN/2017-18 dated 12/07/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 28/12/2017 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Kalyan (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
M/s. Panvelkar Classic Investment
We find that the assessee filed a letter mentioning that an application had been preferred under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat the appeal pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in open Court on 05/08/2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 05/08/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
M/s. Panvelkar Classic Investment