MAHESH ROCHIRAM DUHLANI,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 4(2)(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, following the assessee's intention to use the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme'. The assessee was granted liberty to restore the appeal if the scheme's outcome was not favorable.
What were the facts?
The assessee wished to avail the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle the dispute arising from the appeal. The authorized representative filed a letter seeking to withdraw the appeal for this purpose.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI M.BALAGANESHShri
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.2013-14 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-9/Cir.4/578/2015-16 dated 06/09/2016 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 29/02/2016 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-4(2)(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
We find that the ld. Authorised representative of the assessee Shri Suresh N Otwani, Advocate had filed a letter dated 24/02/2020 stating that the assessee wishes to avail ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme’ for settling dispute arising out of this appeal. Accordingly, the Advocate had also sought to withdraw the appeal filed by the assessee.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing. In view of the letter of the authorised representative dated 24/02/2020 seeking to withdraw the appeal on the ground of availing ‘Vivad se Vishawas Scheme’ and in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in case of Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT in T.C.A. No.372 of 2020 dated 16.10.2020, there is no need to keep this appeal pending in this Tribunal wherein Hon'ble High Court after considering the intention of the assessee to avail the benefit of ‘Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ (VSV Scheme), had dismissed the appeal by observing in Para 7 to 9 as under: - “7. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a Miscellaneous Petition for Restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders.
In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/ assessee to file the Form No.I on or before 20.11.2020 and the competent authority shall process the application/ declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form.
With this declaration, the Tax Case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently the Substantial Question of Law are left upon. No costs.”
3.1. In view of the aforesaid letter dated 24/02/2020 of the authorised representative and in view of the aforesaid decision of the Madras High Court, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed with a liberty given to the assessee that in case if the declaration to be filed by the assessee / filed by the assessee under ‘Vivad se Vishawas Scheme’ is not attained finality for any reason whatsoever, the assessee is at liberty to approach this Tribunal with a Miscellaneous application for restoration of the appeal. The Registry will place such petition before the Bench concerned.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn as per the above mentioned observations.
Order pronounced in open Court on 11/08/2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026