M/S RAJASHREE SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, COIMBATORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1708/CHNY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 March 2022AY 2013-143 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the revision order passed by the PCIT was bad and illegal. The issue was squarely covered by the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, which allowed such payments made within the due date of filing the return of income.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed deductions for ESI and PF paid beyond the due date. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) revised the assessment order, directing the disallowance of these claims based on a CBDT circular.

What were the issues?

Whether ESI and PF contributions paid after the due date but before the due date of filing the return of income are allowable deductions. Whether the revision order under Section 263 was justified in light of the jurisdictional High Court's decision.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 36(1)(va),Section 2(24)(x),Section 139(1),Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGHAND Dr. M.L. MEENA

Hearing: 09.03.2022Pronounced: 10.03.2022

आदेश /O R D E R PER BENCH:

1.

This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the revision order passed by Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -1, Chennai in C.No.120(20)/263/PCIT-1/CBE/2017-18 dated 23.03.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14. The assessment was framed by the DCIT, Corporate Circle 2, Coimbatore for the assessment year 2013-14 u/s. 2 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) vide order dated 03.03.2016

2.

At the outset, the ld.counsel for the assessee stated that the PCIT while revising the assessment and passing revision order u/s.263 of the Act directed the AO to disallow the claim of ESI & PF paid beyond due date as prescribed under the respective Acts and in term of provision of section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act. The PCIT relied on Circular No.22/2015 issued by CBDT which expressly states that deduction in respect of any sum received by the assessee from employees, which are governed by section 36(1)(va) are allowable only if it is paid in the relevant fund before the due date. The ld.counsel for the assessee stated that this issue is squarely covered by the decision of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of M/s. Industrial Security and Intelligence India P Ltd., TCA Nos. 585 & 586 of 2015, order dated 24.07.2015 and hence, revision u/s.263 of the Act is bad and illegal. The ld.CIT-DR could not controvert the above stated factual situation. As the issue is squarely covered by the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of M/s. Industrial Security and Intelligence India P Ltd., supra and in the present case, assessee admittedly made payment of employees contribution of PF & ESI within the due date of filing of return of income of the assessee u/s.139(1) of 3 the Act, we quash the revision order and allow the appeal of the assessee.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the court on 10th March, 2022 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)

All 6,054 judgments and leading authorities on Section 36(1)(va) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →