Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 20.12.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2013-14.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel of the assessee brought to the notice of the Bench that the assessee has gone into Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and also submitted that form No.3 also has already been issued. The Ld. A.R., therefore, prayed before the Bench that appeal may kindly be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. D.R. fairly conceded to the withdrawal of the appeal.
2 ITA No.1415/M/2019 Mr. Shetal Thakershi Patel
Accordingly, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27.09.2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (Mahavir Singh) (Rajesh Kumar) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Mumbai, Dated: 27.09.2021. * Kishore, Sr. P.S.
Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The CIT (A) Concerned, Mumbai The DR Concerned Bench //True Copy// [ By Order
Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.