RISORGIMENTO INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-4(1), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 88/KOL/2021Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 June 2022AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, finding sufficient cause. It was held that the CIT(A) had erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without adjudicating the merits. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was filed late by 1471 days due to non-service of the appellate order. The CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal ex-parte without dealing with the merits of the case. The Assessing Officer had made additions under Section 14A and Section 56(2)(viia).

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without considering the merits of the additions made by the AO. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A,Section 56(2)(viia),Section 143(3),Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: SRI MANISH BORAD & SRI SONJOY SARMA

order

: June 15th, 2022 ORDER

Per Manish Borad, Accountant Member:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2014-15 is directed against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the “Act”) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Kolkata [in short ld. “CIT(A)”] dated 20.02.2019 arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 24.12.2016.

2.

Registry has informed that the present appeal is time barred by 1471 days. On going through the affidavit filed by the assessee stating the reasons for the said delay, we find that the appellate I.T.A. No.: 88/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2014-15 Risorgimento Industrial Co. Ltd. order was not served upon the assessee either by post or by e-mail. After filing letter to the concerned CIT(A), a certified copy of the appellate order was issued to the assessee on February, 2021. Thereafter, immediately the assessee filed appeal before this Tribunal. We find sufficient force and reasonable cause for such delay and thus, condone the delay of 1471 days and admit the appeal for adjudication on merit. 3. A perusal of Form-36 filed by the assessee, Form-35 filed by the assessee before the ld. CIT(A) reveals that two additions have been made by the ld. Assessing Officer (in short ld. “AO”) in the assessment order dated 24.12.2016 u/s 143(3) of the Act, firstly, disallowance u/s 14A of the Act at Rs. 4,75,649/- and secondly, u/s 56(2)(viia) of the Act at Rs. 3,28,125/-. Both these additions were confirmed by ld. CIT(A) and the assessee has challenged the same before this Tribunal. However, on perusal of the impugned order it is revealed that it is an ex-parte order and ld. CIT(A) has not dealt with the merits of the case and dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine. 4. Ld. D/R had no objection if the issues raised in the instant appeal to the file of ld. CIT(A) for afresh adjudication. 5. We, therefore, after hearing ld. D/R and perusing the records placed before us, in the interest of justice, deem fit to restore the two issues i.e. addition u/s 14A of the Act at Rs. 4,75,649/- and addition u/s 56(2)(viia) of the Act at Rs. 3,28,125/- for de-novo adjudication to ld. CIT(A). The assessee is directed to remain vigilant and file necessary documents, if considered, in support of I.T.A. No.: 88/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2014-15 Risorgimento Industrial Co. Ltd. its grounds of appeal

and should not take adjournment, unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. In case after providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee, there is no compliance before the ld. CIT(A), then ld. CIT(A) can pass the speaking order in accordance with law.

6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 15th June, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- [Sonjoy Sarma] [Manish Borad] Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 15.06.2022 Bidhan (P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to:

1. Risorgimento Industrial Co. Ltd., 8, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, 1st Floor, Kolkata-700 013.

2. ITO, Ward-4(1), Kolkata. 3. CIT(A)-2, Kolkata. 4. CIT- 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →