Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “D”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JM) & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (AM)
PER SAKTIJIT DEY, JM Captioned appeals by the same assessee, are against two separate orders, one passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Mumbai dated 25.02.2019 while disposing of assessee’s appeal arising out of assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Act Assessment Year: 2011-12 for the assessment year 2011-12 and second one is against order dated 29.03.2019 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- 10, Mumbai under section 263 of the Act for the very same assessment year.
When the appeals were taken up for hearing, no one was present for the assessee. However, assessee has furnished letter dated 27.03.2021 seeking withdrawal of the appeals, as, the dispute arising in the appeals have been settled under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 with the issuance of Form-5 by the designated authority.
The learned Departmental Representative has no objection to withdrawal of the appeals by the assessee.
In view of the facts discussed above and considering assessee’s request, we permit withdrawal of the captioned appeals. Accordingly, appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, both the appeals are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 31st August, 2021. (RAJESH KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER
म ुंबई Mumbai; दिन ुंक Dated: 31/08/2021
Alindra, PS Assessment Year: 2011-12
आदेश प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. आयकर आय क्त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आय क्त / CIT 5. दिभ गीय प्रदिदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, म ुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, सत्य दपि प्रदि //// उि/सहायक िंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.