PRIYANKA SANTRA,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD-47(6), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order and that the ends of justice would be met by giving the assessee another opportunity. The appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) resulted in an ex-parte order without considering the merits of the case. The assessee requested another opportunity to present her case before the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) without considering the merits of the case is sustainable. Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present her case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar]
ORDER
Per Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] dated 29.12.2021 for the assessment year 2017-18.
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the First Appellate Authority has passed an ex-parte order without considering the merits of the case. The ld. Counsel therefore submitted before the bench that the assessee may kindly be given one more opportunity to present her case before the ld CIT(A) and thus prayed that the appeal of the assessee may kindly be restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. D.R. on the other hand left the issue at the wisdom of the Bench.
After hearing the both parties and perusing the facts on record, we note that the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) is an ex-parte order without considering the merit of the case. Under these facts , we are of the view that the ends of justice could be met if the assessee gets one more opportunity to present her case before the first appellate authority. Accordingly we restore the issue back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with the direction to decide the appeal by considering the merits of the case after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Priyanka Santra 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 27th June, 2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026