Facts
The appellant, Kalavatiben Bhogilal Shah Charitable Trust, filed an application for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application, finding that the trust's objects were not purely charitable. The trust appealed this order.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(Exemption) had not considered the evidence filed by the applicant trust. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration of the application and the evidence submitted.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(Exemption) properly appreciated the charitable nature of the trust's objects and the evidence filed, and if the rejection of the application was arbitrary.
Sections Cited
80G(5), 80G(5B), 2(15)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH
Before: Dr. BRR Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble
आदेश/ORDER
Per Suchitra Kamble, Judicial Member:
This is an appeal filed against the order dated 22-11-2024 passed by CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad for assessment year N.A.
The grounds of appeal
are as under:- “1. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Ahmedabad, erred in law and on facts by rejecting the appellant's application under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without appropriately appreciating the charitable nature of the trust's objects.
2. The rejection of the application based on the alleged religious nature of one object, despite the predominantly charitable and public benefit-oriented nature of the trust's activities, is arbitrary, unjust, and contrary to the provisions of Section 80G of the Act.
3. The Learned CIT(Exemptions) failed to consider that the promotion and maintenance of places such as Dharmshalas, community halls, hospitals, and educational campuses in Kalavatiben Bhogilal Shah Charitable Trust, A.Y. N.A. abandoned or religious areas also serve a charitable purpose benefiting the public at large, irrespective of religion.
4. The Learned CIT(Exemptions) misinterpreted the provisions of Section 80G(5), ignoring the trust's charitable intent and its activities' larger benefit to society, leading to an unjust conclusion.
5. The Ld. CIT-Exemption, Ahmedabad has erred in interpreting the legislative intent underlying the provision of Section 80G(5B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The said provision was inserted by Finance Act, 1999 with a view to extend eligibility for approval under section 80G(5) to trusts or institution predominantly engaged in charitable activities. According to this provision, eligibility for the approval under section 80G(5) is extended to trust or institution predominantly engaged in charitable activities provided their expenditure on religious activities does not exceed 5% of their income during the relevant previous year. The appellant trust conforms to this criterion as it has not incurred any expenditure towards religious activity.
6. The appellant prays that the Hon'ble Tribunal grant approval under Section 80G(5) of the Act by holding that the appellant trust is eligible for such approval, and/or pass such further orders as deemed just and proper in the interest of justice.
The appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.”
The facts of the case are that the applicant is a Public Charitable Trust and the activities of the trust are charitable within the meaning of section 2(15) of the I.T. Act. The applicant trust filed the application in Form 10AB on 23.08.2024 for approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Notices were issued from time to time requesting to furnish details/documents. The CIT(E) rejected the application of the applicant vide order dated 22-11-2024. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(E), the applicant trust filed appeal before the Tribunal.
At the outset, the Ld. A.R. submitted that the CIT(E) has rejected the application for approval u/s. 80G of the Act of the assessee without considering the evidence which has already been filed along original Form 10AB application on 23.08.2024. Therefore, Kalavatiben Bhogilal Shah Charitable Trust, A.Y. N.A.
Ld. A.R. submitted that the matter may be remanded to then CIT(E) for proper adjudication. The CIT-D.R. relied upon the order of the CIT(E).
We have heard both the parties and perused all the relevant record. It is pertinent to note that the CIT(E) has not at all considered the evidence filed by the applicant trust. Hence, it will be appropriate to remand the matter to the file of the CIT(E) for consideration of the application afresh and to pass an order by taking into consideration the evidences filed by the applicant trust. The applicant trust be given opportunity of hearing by following principles of natural justice.
In the result, the appeal of the applicant trust is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 22-04-2025 Sd/- Sd/- (Dr. BRR Kumar) (Suchitra Kamble) Vice President Judicial Member Ahmedabad : Dated 22/04/2025 आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद