BABIES & US FERTILITY IVF & ICSI CENTRE,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 3(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had sought withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Both parties agreed to this course of action.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2010-11. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the issue under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and filed the necessary declaration.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee who has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
ORDER PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, A.M. The present appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-51, Mumbai [in short ‘CIT(A)’] for the assessment year 2010-11 dated 28/01/2020 and arises out of assessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act).
At the outset, the Ld. AR submitted that assessee has preferred to settle the issue under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and relevant information is filed vide letter dated 03/09/2021 and submitted that it has filed the necessary
Babies & US Fertility & ICSI Centre 2 declaration under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) and confirmed the receipt of Form No. 3.
The Ld. DR also did not object to course so suggested.
Heard the learned Counsels for both the parties and perused material on record. Considering the fact that the assessee has sought withdrawal of the present appeal, as it has applied for settling the dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and received the confirmation of Form No. 3. Therefore, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal as per assessee’s request as withdrawn. In case for some reason, the Revenue dismiss the plea of the assessee under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, it can apply to restore the matter in due course.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026