PR. CIT - 9, MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. M/S. ANCHOR DAEWOO INDUSTRIES LTD., MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, stating that the addition was academic as the book profit was negative and MAT provisions did not apply. The deletion of interest was upheld.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer added interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234D to the book profit for MAT computation. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, holding that such interest is not part of 'Income Tax paid/payable'. The Revenue appealed this deletion.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234D is includible in book profit for MAT computation under section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI
O R D E R भहावीय स िंह, उऩाध्मक्ष के द्वाया / PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP: This appeal of the assessee is arising out of order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)]-16, Mumbai [in short CIT(A)], in Appeal Nos. CIT(A)-16/ITO-9(3)(2)/IT-11618/2015-16 vide dated 24.12.2019. The Assessment was framed by the Dy.
2. The only issue in this appeal of Revenue is against the order of CIT(A) deleting the addition on account of interest under section 234B, 234C and 234D of the Act while computing book profit under section 115JB of the Act. For this, Revenue has raised the following two grounds:-
“1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) is right in deleting the addition on account of interst under section 234B, 234C and 234D to the tune of ₹3,43,86,460/- for determination of book profit u/s. 115JB of the Act without appreciating of the I.T. Act without appreciating the clause (ii) to Explanation 2 of the Act read with clause (a) of the Explanation 1 of the Act, which clearly states „Income Tax‟ shall include any interest charged under this Act?
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has rightly held that the term “Income Tax paid / payable” does not includes interest thereon?”
I Income from House Property 4,20,000 (as per CoI) II Business Loss (As per CoI) (7,24,37,595) Add: Interest u/s 234/C/D (para 5.4) 3,43,86,460 Total Income (3,76,31,135) 4. The Assessing Officer also computed the total income i.e. MAT calculation under section 115JB of the Act and the relevant computation read as under:-
MAT Calculation u/s. 115JB of the Act Particulars Rs. Book Profit as per computation (7,05,33,557) Add: Interest u/s 234B/C/D (para 6) 3,43,86,460 Book Profit u/s 115JB (3,61,47,097) 5. According to Assessing Officer, since the book profit is negative figure, the provisions of MAT will not apply in this case and accordingly the income was assessed at a total loss of ₹3,76,31,135/-. Aggrieved, against the addition of interest under section 234B, 234C and 234D amounting to ₹3,48,86,460/- and carried forward of business loss to the extent of ₹3,61,47,097/-, assessee preferred the appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax “6.2.3 I had considered the contention raised by the Assessing Officer as well as by the appellant. As per the provision of section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 only specific amount can be added back/ deducted from the book profit. As per clause (a) to Explanation 1 of section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the amount of income tax paid or payable and provision thereof, can only be added to the book profit of the appellant. From the foregoing paras it is clear that the interest paid under section 234B, 234C and 234D of the Income Tax, 1961 are not forming part of the Tax amount as per section 2(43) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
6.2.4 In view of the above, the appellant had correctly not added the interest component to the book profit for determining adjustable book profit as per section 115Jb of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without adding the interest component. Hence, this ground of appeal is allowed.”
Aggrieved, now Revenue is in appeal before Tribunal.
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026