MR JASJEET SINGH M CHADDHAH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 26 (1)(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' and received Form-3. Therefore, it was deemed purposeless to keep the appeals pending.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders related to penalties and assessments. At the hearing, the assessee did not appear but submitted a letter indicating their intention to settle the tax litigation under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020'.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' and the respondent having no objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
Appellant by : None Respondent by : Shri S.N Kabra. DR Date of Hearing 21.09.2021 Date of Pronouncement 22.09.2021 आदेश / O R D E R
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM:
The assessee has filed these appeals against the different orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, Mumbai passed u/s 271(1)(c) & u/sec 143(3) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
& 6940/Mum/2019 Mr. Jasjeet Singh M. Chaddah,, Mumbai - 2 -
At the time hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee and the assessee has submitted a letter on 20.09.2021 mentioning that the assessee intend to settle the tax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ (VSVS2020) and received Form 3 under VSVS Rules 2020. Contra, the Ld. DR has no objections.
We heard the Ld. DR and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for ‘Vivaad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ and received Form-3 from the income tax department. We are of the view that, no purpose will be served in keeping the appeals pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals of the assessee as withdrawn and the assessee is given liberty to move an application u/s 254(2) of the Act to recall the present order as per provisions of Law.
In the result, Both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 22.09.2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026