Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SRI MAHAVIR SINGH
भहावीय स िंह, उऩाध्मक्ष के द्वाया / PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP:
These appeals of the assessee are arising out of orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)]-44, Mumbai [in short CIT(A)], in appeal Nos. CIT(A)-44/ITO-32(3)(1)/IT- 252,753,762/15-16 vide dated 23.07.2019. The Assessments were framed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-32(3)(1) Mumbai (in short ITO/ AO) for the A.Ys. 2009-10 to 2011-12 vide order dated 18.03.2015, 17.02.2016, 24.11.2016 under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’).
The registry placed on record assessee’s vide letter dated 18.08.2021, wherein it has been submitted that the assessee Rajnikant L. Shah (HUF); AY 09 -10 to 11-12 has opted for settlement of dispute for all the years under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS Scheme), 2020 and already received Form No.3 from appropriate authority. The Ld. DR did not raise any objection against the same.
In view of foregoing, the appeal stand dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to assessee to seek restoration of the appeal in case the aforesaid declaration filed under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 05.10.2021. (भहावीय स िंह /MAHAVIR SINGH) (उऩाध्मक्ष / VICE PRESIDENT) भ िंफई, ददनािंक/ Mumbai, Dated: 05.10.2021 सुदीप सरकार, व.निजी सचिव / Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीराथी / The Appellant 1. प्रत्मथी / The Respondent. 2. आमकय आम क्त(अऩीर) / The CIT(A) 3. आमकय आम क्त / CIT 4. ववबागीम प्रतततनधध, आमकय अऩीरीम अधधकयण, भ िंफई / DR, ITAT,
Mumbai गार्ड पाईर / Guard file. 6. आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER, त्मावऩत प्रतत //// उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Asstt.