NEW HORIZON EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 800/AHD/2025Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 June 2025Bench: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee now possessed the missing documents and requested an opportunity to submit them. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) rejected the application citing failure to submit requisite details and documents, and lack of genuineness of activities. The assessee neither filed submissions nor sought adjournment.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the registration application without affording the assessee an opportunity to submit additional documents.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL

For Appellant: Shri Pamil H. Shah, AR
For Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Hearing: 19.06.2025Pronounced: 23.06.2025

PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT :

Delay Condoned.

1.

This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(E)”], dated 27.08.2024, whereby the application for registration filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) was rejected.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had applied for registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act in Form No.10AB. The Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application on the ground that the assessee had failed to submit the requisite details/documents and the genuineness of the activities of the assessee, despite issuance of notices from time to time. It was further noted by the Ld. CIT(E) that the assessee neither filed any submissions nor sought any adjournment during the proceedings.

New Horizon Education & Research Foundation Vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : NA - 2–

3.

Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee is now in appeal before the Tribunal.

4.

We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. At the outset, it is noted that the Ld. CIT(E) rejected the assessee’s application on the ground that that the assessee has neither filed any submission nor sought any adjournment in responses to the notices issued. However, during the course of hearing before us, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee is now in possession of all relevant documents which could not be submitted earlier due to unavoidable circumstances. A copy of the said documents has been placed before the Tribunal, in the form of paper- book. The Ld. AR, therefore, requested that an opportunity be granted to submit these documents before the Ld. CIT(E) for proper consideration.

5.

Having considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record, we are of the view that the interests of justice would be met if the matter is restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. We accordingly set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction to consider the documents/details now being made by the assessee and thereafter, to decide the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act afresh, in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

The order is pronounced in the open Court on 23.06.2025

More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)

All 1,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →