SHREE RAMKRISHNA CHARITABLE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and restored the application to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The assessee was directed to furnish necessary documents and be given an opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application for failing to furnish supporting bills/vouchers for its expenditures.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration under section 12AA was justified without affording a proper opportunity and considering all documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGRAWAL.
आदेश/ ORDER
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, J.M:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune [in short ‘the CIT(E)’] dated 27/09/2020 for the assessment year 2019-20.
Shri Bhadresh Doshi, appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the assessee is a Charitable Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The assessee made online application for grant of registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') on 15/12/2019. The CIT(E) without examining the documents furnished by assessee rejected assessee’s application for grant of registration under section 12AA of the Act. The ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee submitted that a direction may be given to CIT(E) to consider the application of assessee, afresh.
Shri B.K.Bagchi representing the Department vehemently supported the impugned order passed under section 12AA of the Act. However, the ld. Departmental Representative submitted that he has no objection if application of the assessee is restored back to CIT(E) for reconsideration.
Both sides heard, impugned order examined. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the assessee’s application for grant of registration under section 12AA of the Act has been rejected for the reason that the assessee has failed to furnish copies of bills/vouchers in support of its claim of expenditure on activities. Taking into consideration entirety of facts, we deem it appropriate to restore this appeal back to the file of CIT(E) to decide the application of assessee for grant of registration under section 12AA of the Act, denovo, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee, in accordance with law. The assessee is directed to furnish necessary documents as may be required by the of CIT(E) while considering aforesaid application.
In the result, impugned order is set-aside and appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026