VINAY BALESHWAR SHARMA,MUMBAI vs. ITO - 15(1)(4), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) is obligated to pass an order on the merits of the case. The dismissal for non-prosecution was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed to the CIT(A) against an addition of Rs. 6,20,000/-. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution without adjudicating the merits of the case.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without deciding the merits of the case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF)73 citing74 ITR 1 · 1969 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” Bench, Mumbai
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of learned CIT-A dated 3.6.2019 pertaining to assessment year 2011-12 wherein learned CIT-A has dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
In this case pursuant to the addition of Rs. 6,20,000/- made by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order, assessee appealed before learned CIT(A). learned CIT(A) did not adjudicate the merits of the issue raised. But he dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
Upon hearing learned Departmental Representative and perusing the records I find that it is incumbent upon the learned CIT-A to pass an order on the merits of the case and not dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. For this proposition I place reliance upon following case laws:-
CIT vs Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) (2017) 154 DTK (Bom) 302 2. CIT vs S Chenniappa Mudaliar(1969)74 ITR 1(SC)
2 Vinay Baleshwar Sharma Accordingly in the interest of justice I remit the issue raised in the appeal the file of the learned CIT-A. Learned CIT-A is directed to consider the issue afresh and pass an order on the merits of the case after giving the assessee proper opportunity of being heard.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026